TAX LEGISLATION
Home Back Services Contact  

 

 TAX LEGISLATION FOR 2001 AND BEYOND  

 

 Social Security Changes

 The Social Security wage base for 2005 is $90,000; 2006 $94,200; 2007 $97,500; 2008 $102,000 and 2009 $106,800

 Phased-in Individual Income Tax Rate Cuts

 

IRS Issues Home Sale Exclusion Rules

 

IR-2002-142, Dec. 23, 2002

WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Service today issued guidance in the form of both final and temporary regulations related to excluding gain on the sale of a principal residence. A 1997 law substituted an exclusion of up to $250,000 ($500,000 for a married couple filing jointly) for the old “replacement residence” rules. Unlike a previous once-in-a-lifetime exclusion for senior citizens, the new exclusion may be claimed repeatedly, but usually only once every two years.

The final regulations cover such topics as:

bullethow to determine if a home is a principal residence;
bulletwhen gain from the sale of vacant land that was used as part of the residence may be excluded;
bulletwhen and how to allocate the gain between residential and business use of the property;
bullethow the exclusion applies to joint owners who are not married; and
bullethow to fulfill the requirement that the taxpayer own and use the home as a principal residence for two of the five years before the sale.

For taxpayers with multiple homes, the regulations list several factors relevant to determining which home is the principal residence. Among these are amount of time used; place of employment; where other family members live; the address used for tax returns, driver’s license, car and voter registration, bills and correspondence; and the location of the taxpayer’s banks, religious organizations or recreational clubs.

The home sale exclusion may include gain from the sale of vacant land that has been used as part of the residence, if the land sale occurs within two years before or after the sale of the residence.

Taxpayers need not allocate gain between business and residential use if the business use occurred within the same dwelling unit as the residential use. They must pay tax on the gain equal to the total depreciation they took after May 6, 1997, but may exclude any additional gain on the residence, up to the maximum amount.  If the business use property was separate from the dwelling unit, they would allocate the gain and be able to exclude only the gain on the residential unit.

For joint owners who are not married, up to $250,000 of gain is tax-free for each qualifying owner.

To exclude gain, a taxpayer must both own and use the home as a principal residence for two of the five years before the sale. The ownership and use periods need not be concurrent. The two years may consist of 24 full months or 730 days. Short absences, such as for a summer vacation, count as periods of use, but longer breaks, such as a one-year sabbatical, do not. The taxpayer also must not have excluded gain on another home sold during the two years before the current sale.

The IRS made these final regulations available for public comment in October 2000.  Several changes resulted from the comments received, including the treatment of gain on property used for both business and residential purposes.

Today, the IRS invited comments on new temporary regulations on the subject of excluding gain, but with a reduced maximum amount, when the seller does not satisfy one of the time rules. The tax law provides an exception to the two-year rules for use, ownership and claimed exclusion when the primary reason for the sale is health, change in place of employment, or, to the extent provided in IRS regulations, “unforeseen circumstances.”

Taxpayers may establish by the facts and circumstances of their situations that their home sales were for one of these reasons. To make things easier, the IRS has identified various “safe harbors” that will automatically establish that the sale is for one of these reasons.

The temporary regulations provide that a home sale will be considered related to a change in employment if a qualified person’s new place of work is at least 50 miles farther from the old home than the old workplace was from that home. This is the same distance rule that applies for the moving expense deduction. The employment change must occur during the taxpayer’s ownership and use of the home as a residence. A qualified person is the taxpayer, the taxpayer’s spouse, a co-owner of the home, or a member of the taxpayer’s household.

A sale will be considered because of health if the primary reason is related to a disease, illness, or injury of a qualified person. If a physician recommends a change in residence for health reasons, that will suffice. In addition to the persons listed above, a qualified person for health reasons includes certain close relatives, so that sales related to caring for sick family members will qualify.

A sale will be considered as occurring primarily because of “unforeseen circumstances” if any of these events occur during the taxpayer’s period of use and ownership of the residence:

bulletdeath,
bulletdivorce or legal separation,
bulletbecoming eligible for unemployment compensation,
bulleta change in employment that leaves the taxpayer unable to pay the mortgage or reasonable basic living expenses,
bulletmultiple births resulting from the same pregnancy,
bulletdamage to the residence resulting from a natural or man-made disaster, or an act of war or terrorism, and
bulletcondemnation, seizure or other involuntary conversion of the property.

Any of the first five situations listed must involve the taxpayer, spouse, co-owner, or a member of the taxpayer’s household to qualify. The regulations also give the IRS Commissioner the discretion to determine other circumstances as unforeseen. 

For qualifying sellers, the maximum exclusion amount of $250,000 ($500,000 for a married couple filing jointly) is limited to the percentage of the two years that the person fulfilled the requirements. Thus, a qualifying seller who owns and occupies a home for one year (half of two years) – and who has not excluded gain on another home in that time – may exclude half the regular maximum amount, or up to $125,000 of gain ($250,000 for most joint returns). The proportion may be figured in days or months.

A taxpayer who now qualifies for a reduced maximum exclusion and has already reported a gain from the sale of a residence on a prior year’s tax return may use Form 1040X to file an amended return claiming the exclusion. Taxpayers may generally amend returns until three years from the original due date. The law did not require taxpayers to meet one of the exceptions before using the reduced maximum exclusion for homes owned on August 5, 1997, and sold within two years after that date. Thus, nearly all taxpayers qualifying under these regulations should be able to use them by amending a recent year’s return.

 

IRS Again Updates Web Item Debunking Frivolous Tax Arguments

 

IR-2003-15, Feb. 12, 2003

WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Service has again updated its Web site document addressing false arguments about the legality of not paying taxes or filing returns. The revisions add citations from several cases decided by the courts during 2002 and respond to one additional argument, making a total of 21 frivolous contentions that are addressed.

“During the filing season, taxpayers will sometimes hear absurd suggestions that they don’t have to pay taxes or file returns,” said IRS Acting Commissioner Bob Wenzel. “We want people to know the truth about these schemes – they don’t work.” 

This past year, the courts have not only rebuked such arguments dozens of times, but also imposed thousands of dollars in fines on taxpayers or their attorneys for pursuing frivolous cases.

IRS Chief Counsel B. John Williams said, "The courts have repeatedly and consistently rejected these arguments and are imposing substantial penalties on taxpayers and promoters for taking frivolous positions. These schemes carry a heavy price, for both the promoters and the participants."

The IRS Chief Counsel’s Office prepared The Truth About Frivolous Tax Arguments in 2001 and revised it last April. The document not only lays out the assertions, it also provides a summary of the law and relevant legal decisions involving these false claims. 

There are also links to the document from “The Newsroom” section’s “What’s Hot” page, the “Tax Pro News” and the “Topics for Individuals” pages of this site.

The IRS continues to investigate promoters of frivolous arguments and to refer cases to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution. Taxpayers who file frivolous income tax returns face a $500 penalty, and may be subject to civil penalties of 20 or 75 percent of the underpaid tax. Those who pursue frivolous tax cases in the courts may face a penalty of up to $25,000, in addition to the taxes, interest and civil penalties that they may owe.

Tax Benefits Relating to Children

  The new law covers four broad areas relating to children. Here are the highlights.

 Child Tax Credit . The legislation retroactively increases the child tax credit for 2007 to $1000 per child through 2010.

 Adoption Expenses . The legislation permanently extends the adoption credit and increases the maximum amount to $10,960. Limitations apply..

 Employer-Provided Child Care Facilities .  The legislation creates a new credit of up to $150,000 per year for employers who provide employees with child care facilities or child care resource and referral services.  The new credit applies in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2001.

 Dependent Care Credit. The legislation also provides more generous dependant care credit limitations that will increase the maximum credit for many taxpayers, to a maximum of $3000 for one qualifying individual or $6000 for two or more

 Education Provisions

  The new law contains several education-related benefits.  Here's a brief summary.

 Education IRAs.    

 *        Increases the annual contribution limit to $2,000 per beneficiary (from $500); and

 *        Can be used to pay for elementary and secondary school as well as higher education; and

*        Increases the phaseout range for joint filers to twice the amount for singles, thus making the phaseout of $190,000 adjusted gross income.

 Qualified Tuition Plans. The legislation contains several provisions liberalizing the rules governing these plans. 

 Employer Provided Educational Assistance . The legislation makes the exclusion, which was scheduled to expire at the end of 2001, permanent, and extends the exclusion to graduate level courses beginning after December 31, 2001.

 Student Loan Interest Deduction . Maximum amount $2500

 *        Increases the income phase-out range for eligibility  at $50,000 of "modified adjusted gross income" for single filers and $100,000 for joint filers.

Above-the-line Deduction for Qualified Higher Education Expenses .  Eligible taxpayers can deduct "qualified tuition and related expenses," as defined for purposes of the HOPE credit, lifetime learning credit or higher education tax deduction. Amounts are from $1,650 to $4,000 and limits on adjusted gross income apply.

Retirement Savings Provisions

Rollovers Get Easier

In an attempt to do away with barriers that complicate retirement savings, the new law will also make it possible to consolidate different types of retirement accounts into one.  Balances from IRAs, 401(k)s, 403(b)s and 457 plans can be rolled into one another, making it easier to manage retirement planning and income after retirement.  

Phase-in Retirement Savings Provisions

2009 2008 2007
Traditional IRA, Roth IRA, Spousal Guardian $  5,000 $  5,000 $  4,000
Traditional, Roth, Spousal IRA Catch-up Contribution $  1,000 $  1,000 $  1,000
Elective Deferrals 
(402g,401k SARSEP, 457 and 403b
$16,500 $15,500 $15,500
SIMPLE Plan Deferrals $11,500 $10,500 $10,500
SIMPLE IRA Catch-up Limit $  2,500 $  2,500 $  2,500
Defined Contribution 415 Limit
 (the lesser of 100% of comp or)
$49,000 $46,000 $45,000
Salary Deferral Catch-up Limit
(does not count against 415 Limits in a 401K plan)
$  5,500 $  5,000 $  5,000

     

The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) substantially increased pension and IRA contribution limits through 2010 as well as providing other improvements in pension and retirement savings through vesting, portability and reduced regulatory burdens. For example, the maximum amount that a taxpayer could contribute to a tax-favored IRA plan was $2,000 a year prior to 2001. EGTRRA increased that limit in steps to $5,000 by 2008 and 2009.  The $5,000 limit will also be increased each year after 2009 to reflect inflation. The 2001 legislation increased the limits on the maximum tax-deductible amount that an employee can contribute to an employer-sponsored defined contribution retirement plan such as a 401(k) plan. This limit was increased in steps from $10,500 a year in 2001 to $16,500 a year in 2009.  EGTRRA also instituted new catch-up contributions for individuals age 50 and older—allowing them to annually contribute an extra $5,000 to 401(k) plans and an extra $1,000 to IRAs. Catch-up contributions provide a significant savings boost for baby boomers, women previously out of the workforce, and those who fell behind in their retirement savings. The 2001 legislation also created incentives for small employers to offer pension plans. As mentioned above, all these favorable provisions were scheduled to terminate at the end of 2010 (reverting back to pre-EGTRRA law and limits), but under the Act these favorable changes are made permanent.

Similarly, EGTRRA removed existing barriers that prevented employees from being able to take their retirement savings with them when they switched jobs, particularly when they moved from different employment sectors. For the first time, employees changing jobs were permitted to take their retirement savings with them when they moved between 401(k), 403(b) and state and local 457 arrangements. If EGTRRA had not been made permanent, this portability would have ended, presenting employees with a frustrating barrier that often led them to cash out their retirement savings. The Act ensures that these flexible rollover and portability rules will stay in place.

By making EGTRRA permanent, the Act preserves the advantages of (i) higher employee contribution limits for employer plans, (ii) higher IRA contribution limits, (iii) more flexible plan rules, (iv) portability, (v) a catch-up for those over 50 years of age, and (vi) an increase in employer contribution limits.

The Act also makes permanent the saver's credit, which would not have been available after 2006 absent the Act. The saver's credit is a tax credit for low and moderate-income savers who contribute to workplace retirement plans or IRAs. Under this provision, single individuals earning up to $15,000 and married couples earning up to $30,000 can receive a tax credit of up to 50 percent of the first $2,000 contributed to a retirement plan or IRA. The new law also indexes the saver's credit income limits to prevent this benefit from being eroded by inflation.

   Death Tax Repeal

 *        The repeal applies to the Federal estate and generation-skipping taxes. It does not repeal the Federal gift tax. Also, the legislation does not eliminate any State "death taxes";

 *        Death tax repeal may eliminate the income tax savings achieved through a "step up" in the basis of property received from a decedent. As a result, families may not be able to take advantage of the potential benefits of death tax repeal without careful planning.

   

 
 
     
Click here for Background Checks, Public records
COPYRIGHT 2000 - 2009 John Van Vorst, CPA, P.A.
    Last modified: February 04, 2010

This site has been visited Hit Counter times